
Putting Beliefs on Trial
Cognitive Restructuring
A structured framework for examining beliefs and statements — weighing evidence on both sides to reach a balanced, rational verdict.
Learn more about Cognitive RestructuringThe Courtroom
The Judge & Jury
The Judge's Role
The Judge presides over the trial, overseeing the entire process — impartial, rational, and committed to finding the truth.
The Judge's task is to ensure that all evidence — both for and against — is heard fairly before delivering a final, balanced verdict.
The Jury's Role
Members of the Jury hear the evidence to determine the facts and deliver a verdict — guilty or not guilty — based on that evidence.
They remain impartial, listen to evidence from both the prosecution and the defence, and follow the judge's legal directions.
The Accused
Key Statement / Belief: What's on Trial?
What statement or belief is on trial? Define it clearly before proceeding. This is the foundation of the entire exercise. We will be placing this statement or belief in the dock.
Type your statement into the box below.
Initial Rating
Understanding your starting point helps reveal how evidence shifts your perspective by the end of the trial.
Before examining any evidence, rate your initial belief that this statement is true on a scale of 0 to 100% and type this into the box below.
In Search of Truth
The courtroom process is designed to move beyond gut feeling and assumption — toward evidence-based thinking.
Both sides of the argument must be examined with equal rigor.
Facts vs. Opinion
Distinguish between hard factual evidence and personal opinion throughout the process.
Witness Perspectives
Consider what others would say — different viewpoints strengthen the quality of the verdict.
Balanced Outcome
The goal is a realistic, rational closing statement — not simply confirming what you already believe.


Examine the Evidence
The evidence is divided into two sides. Both must be examined thoroughly and honestly before any conclusions are drawn.
The Defence
Evidence supporting the statement
The Prosecution
Evidence challenging the statement
Core Question
What tells you this statement or belief is true? What hard, factual evidence supports it?
List all evidence that argues in favour of the belief — be specific and honest.
Evidence for the Defence
Evidence for the Prosecution
Core Question
What tells you this statement or belief is not totally true, all of the time? What is merely opinion, and what factual evidence is there?
Consider what witnesses — others who know the situation — would say.
Summarising Both Sides
After gathering all evidence, summarise the key arguments from each side.
Then rate your belief in each summary before moving to the Judge's final verdict.
Defence Summary
Summarise the defence's strongest points in a few sentences.
Rate your belief in this summary: 0–100%.
Prosecution Summary
Summarise the prosecution's strongest points in a few sentences.
Rate your belief in this summary: 0–100%.
Review the Evidence & Sum Up
With all evidence heard from both the Defence and the Prosecution, the Judge now delivers a closing statement.
This must be based on the evidence — realistic, rational, and balanced.
The Judge's Closing Statement
Find a realistic, rational, balanced closing statement that fairly reflects both sides of the evidence and type this into the box below. Avoid extremes — the truth is rarely black and white.
Final Belief Rating
How much do you believe this new statement is true? Rate it from 0 to 100% — and compare it to your initial rating at the start of the trial.
The Verdict
The trial is complete. A balanced, evidence-based verdict replaces an unchallenged belief — the foundation of clearer, more rational thinking.
Start
Initial belief rating (0–100%) before examining evidence:
Evidence
Defence and prosecution arguments weighed fairly.
Verdict
Final belief rating (0–100%) after a balanced review: